Labor Must Clean its Own House
Hands off the Teamsters!
On 10 June the U.S. Justice Department announced that it is preparing a lawsuit against the 1.7 million member International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) under the infamous Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO). The suit is aimed at taking over the union and, if successful, will cost IBT president Jackie Presser his job. This is somewhat ironic, as Presser was head of one of two major unions which openly supported Ronald Reagans election to the White House. (The other was PATCOsmashed by Reagan in 1981.) In Pressers case, the irony is compounded by last years revelation that he had been on the government payroll for years as an FBI informant.
The suit is the latest move in an ongoing campaign by the U.S. government to establish tame, housebroken unions that police the workers in the interests of the ruling class. Beginning with the Wagner Act in 1935, continuing with the Taft-Hartley Act in 1947 and the Landrum-Griffin Act in 1959 and backed by an endless number of court injunctions and criminal prosecutions, the U.S. government has continually sought to extend the control of the capitalist state over the organized workers movement.
Last March, in what was clearly a dress rehearsal for the RICO attack, the government got a court-ordered takeover of Teamster Local 560 in Union City, New Jersey and appointed Joel Jacobson, a Democratic Party politician and former union bureaucrat, as virtual dictator. The locals leaders, like Anthony (Tony Pro) Provenzano, were widely known to have mob connections. Tony Pros daughter Josephine earned $71,000 a year as the locals nominal Secretary-Treasurer. This kind of thing made it easy for the Reagan adminstrations top cop, Ed Meese, and his underlings in the Justice Department, to masquerade as reformers and friends of the Teamster rank-and-file, who only wish to clean up the union.
For years the reformist left has advocated the tactic of using the bosses government to battle corrupt union bureaucrats. A classic case, widely debated in the left press at the time, was when court-ordered elections supervised by Richard Nixons Labor Department put Arnold Miller into the presidency of the United Mine Workers in 1972. Virtually every centrist and reformist outfit in the U.S. left lined up to critically support Miller in his campaign to replace the corrupt and murderous regime of Tony Boyle. Miller was eventually driven from office in 1977, but not before he demonstrated the logic of his Labor Department candidacy by negotiating two sell-out contracts, and siding continually with the courts and the coal bosses against wildcat strikes by rank-and-file miners.
A witless article in the 22 June San Francisco Examiner by Ken Paff, National Organizer of the social-democratic Teamsters for a Democratic Union (TDU), shows that the reformists learned nothing from the UMW experience. Paff cites Millers election as a positive example and says:
If the Justice Department is going to sue the top IBT officials, using the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act, let it be to give the members a chance. The Press has reported a court-ordered trusteeship in which the 18 members of the unions general executive board will be removed and replaced... But its difficult to see how a trusteeship over the¼IBT could be workable¼.What would inspire Teamsters members is providing them with the right to elect their top officers, a right Teamsters do not now have¼.
The first principle of socialist trade unionism is unconditional opposition to all government intervention in the workers movement. The government is no neutral mediator standing above the class struggle, it is the instrument of the bossestheir executive committee. Each time a union leadership knuckles under to a court injunction, each time a government agency runs a union election, the labor movement gives up a bit more of its independence from the capitalistsand therefore its ability to act in the interests of the working class.
Published: 1917 No.4 (Autumn 1987)